This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that develops open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides responses similar to other modern big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these two nations to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more recognized competitors has been described as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first chance at what is emerging as an international AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be easily available for usage, adjustment, watching, and creating files for developing functions. [13] The company supposedly vigorously hires young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer science field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is freely offered for usage, modification, and viewing. This consists of authorization to gain access to and use the source code, along with design files, for constructing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence lab devoted to research establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in supplying funding as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to create an exit in a brief time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being called the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was rewarding compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no in-depth strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise enables its innovation to avoid the most strict arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to a lot of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people without any computer system science background to help its innovation understand other topics and understanding locations, consisting of having the ability to create poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available totally free to both researchers and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and accountable downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was developed to take on other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes greater than many open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the two Base designs was also launched simultaneously, obtained by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that may not be. They found this to assist with . In standard MoE, some specialists can end up being overly depended on, while other professionals might be seldom used, squandering parameters. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are similarly utilized then causes experts to replicate the same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to find out core capacities that are frequently used, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capacities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step solutions. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward design was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was constantly updated throughout training to avoid benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The first stage was trained to fix math and coding problems. This stage used 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be useful, safe, and follow rules. This phase utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human preference data. The rule-based benefit model was by hand programmed. All skilled reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning information had “special attributes” different from RL on general data. For instance, RL on thinking could enhance over more training actions. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “more research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of experts (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was produced by a reward design trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning data was produced by “professional models”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by people. – The “skilled designs” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify throughout thinking. Then the professional designs were RL utilizing an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to create simply synthetic thinking data in one specific domain (math, programs, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information consisting of both final reward and chain-of-thought leading to the final benefit. The benefit model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective however free-form answers, and concerns without objective responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was calculated for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programming issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to attain efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, needing unique GEMM regimens to collect accurately. They utilized a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each expert was on in order to avoid specific machines being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available through DeepSeek’s API, as well as via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached an option quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data generated by R1. [47]

A conversation in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially believes about the thinking procedure in the mind and after that supplies the user with the response. The thinking procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not defined): precision rewards and format rewards. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is appropriate (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was examining whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these concerns and more enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the created thinking had a wrong final answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers concerns, solves reasoning problems and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have needed only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably very little cost has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the international dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s latest models when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and suggestions on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models subsequently “sparked market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant global technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had actually caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the official application programming user interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For instance, the design declines to address questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce an answer, however then deletes it shortly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and limitations can just be gotten rid of to a minimal degree in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We strongly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into offering certain responses to a few of these subjects by asking for in its answer to switch specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We keep the info we collect in secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data security authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited the usage of DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s use of individual information. [83]

Artificial intelligence industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model appears to be among the finest ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design development highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely outstanding”: “We must take the developments out of China extremely, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily restricted brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, information personal privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks info from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.