Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language models (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with numerous smaller sized companies have actually established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a vast array of markets, consisting of software development, healthcare, financing, home entertainment, customer care, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] style, [18] and item design. [19] However, issues have been raised about the potential misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using fake news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual residential or commercial property law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and emulate copyrighted masterpieces. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of producing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have formerly been checked out by myth, fiction and viewpoint because antiquity. [23] The principle of automated art go back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having created machines capable of composing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s robot developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages considering that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his very first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The academic discipline of artificial intelligence was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of advancement and optimism in the decades considering that. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually used artificial intelligence to develop creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and showing generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen developed to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, particularly computer-aided procedure preparation, utilized to generate sequences of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and constraint satisfaction and were a “relatively mature” innovation by the early 1990s. They were utilized to create crisis action plans for military usage, [35] procedure plans for manufacturing [33] and decision plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of machine learning used both discriminative models and generative designs, to design and anticipate information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep knowing drove development and research in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks capable of finding out generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not only class labels for images but likewise entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled improvements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] leading to the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize unsupervised to various tasks as a Structure model. [40]

The brand-new generative models presented throughout this period permitted large neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision knowing or semi-supervised learning, rather than the monitored knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the requirement for human beings to manually label information, enabling larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that might produce persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to top quality expert system art development from natural language prompts. [46] These systems showed unmatched capabilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and develops based on text descriptions, resulting in extensive adoption amongst artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT transformed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural discussions, generate innovative material, help with coding, and carry out different analytical jobs caught worldwide attention and stimulated extensive conversation about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might reasonably be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) variation of a synthetic general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who preserved that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating several modalities including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design offered in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed plans for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of large language designs, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed significant improvements in abilities across various standards, with Claude 3 Opus significantly outshining leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants using the innovation, going beyond both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using without supervision machine learning (invoking for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker discovering trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or type of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language designs). They can natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on programs language text, allowing them to generate source code for brand-new computer programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing top quality visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically utilized for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, launched in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website got widespread attention for its capability to generate mentally expressive speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music in addition to text annotations, in order to create new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a soothing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been produced, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists need to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been created that can be generated using a text phrase, category alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to create brand-new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research uses triggers like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to control movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out primary reasoning in action to user triggers and visual input, such as picking up a toy dinosaur when provided the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be developed using linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are used to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been incorporated into a variety of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise readily available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI models with approximately a few billion parameters can operate on smart devices, ingrained devices, and individual computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion criteria) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of criteria can work on laptop or desktop computer systems. To accomplish an acceptable speed, models of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For example, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be configured to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally consist of protection of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That forum is one of only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, generally operate on datacenter computer systems geared up with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large models are usually accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the marketplace efficient in acknowledging text produced by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for discovering generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and maker learning classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have often produced false positives, erroneously accusing trainees of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and regulation

In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report information to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act includes requirements to divulge copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark generated images or videos, guidelines on training data and label quality, restrictions on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI must “comply with socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly offered datasets that include copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is protected under reasonable use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair use training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works available to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, numerous suits connected to the usage of copyrighted material in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over the usage of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can qualify for copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works produced by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, because they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has actually also begun taking public input to identify if these rules require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has actually raised concerns from federal governments, companies, and people, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has enormous potential for excellent and evil at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge worldwide development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, however that its destructive usage “might trigger horrific levels of death and damage, widespread injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have actually been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems actually need to be done by them, provided the distinction in between computers and human beings, and between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the tasks for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “artificial intelligence postures an existential risk to innovative professions” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work concerns among underrepresented groups worldwide remains a critical element. While AI assures effectiveness improvements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting amongst these groups, as laid out in surveys by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps include mitigating biases, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and permission, and welcoming varied groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on policy, inclusive design, and education’s potential for individualized mentor to take full advantage of benefits while reducing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI models can reflect and magnify any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For example, a language model might assume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are common in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A number of methods for mitigating bias have been tried, such as altering input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with another person’s likeness using synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered widespread attention and issues for their uses in deepfake star adult videos, vengeance pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial scams, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited actions from both industry and government to identify and limit their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (dispersed ledger technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to produce controversial declarations in the singing style of celebrities, public authorities, and other popular people have actually raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software application utilized to clone voices has been used on well-known artists’ voices to produce tunes that mimic their voices, acquiring both tremendous appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have also been used to produce better quality or full-length versions of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has also been utilized to develop new digital artist characters, with some of these getting sufficient attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise developing artists which develop unrealistic or immoral attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop sensible phony material has actually been exploited in various types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to produce disinformation and scams. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos end up being perfectly reasonable, they would stop appearing impressive to viewers, potentially resulting in uncritical approval of false details. [159] Additionally, large language models and other forms of text-generation AI have been used to develop phony reviews of e-commerce sites to enhance rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually created big language designs concentrated on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, allowing assaulters to obtain aid with hazardous requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety constraints at low expense. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous quantity of computing power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have actually revealed issues about the ecological effect that the development and deployment of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big amounts of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these effects may increase as these models are included into commonly utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs need to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation techniques consist of factoring potential environmental costs prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of data centers to decrease electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more effective maker finding out models, [168] [166] [169] lessening the number of times that designs need to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed structure for auditing the environmental impact of these designs, [168] [167] regulating for openness of these models, [167] controling their energy and water usage, [168] motivating researchers to release information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter professionals who understand both artificial intelligence and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “inferior or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search results.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade generated content with regard to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary incentives from social networks companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover higher quality or desired material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of web pages, were machine translated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were translated across at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped upgrading the data for several factors: high costs for getting information from Reddit and Twitter, extreme concentrate on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to a surge of AI-generated material across numerous domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of recently published computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer review text now integrate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a comparable pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that an average of 34 million images have actually been developed daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated material is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, defects in the resulting designs might occur. [185] Training an AI design solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new design is trained on the previous model’s output, causes progressive destruction and eventually leads to a “model collapse” after numerous models. [186] Tests have been carried out with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the worth of data collected from real human interactions with systems might become significantly important in the existence of LLM-generated content in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is typically utilized as an option to information produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to validate mathematical models and to train device learning designs while protecting user privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The method is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been employed to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview consisted of an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards amidst the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have released short articles whose material and/or byline have actually been confirmed or thought to be produced by generative AI models – typically with incorrect content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce short articles for much of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced 10s of thousands of articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually provided news with anchors based upon Generative AI models, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have actually also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based upon input information supplied, such as “information of present events”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch explained it as” [taking] for given the effort that went into producing precise and artful newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay small publishers to compose 3 articles daily using a beta generative AI design. The program does not require the knowledge or consent of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the released posts to be labeled as being produced or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually undergone cybersquatting, with articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed concern that generative AI might have a harmful impact on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to possible mistakes around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over declining audience trust, outlets around the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published standards around how they prepare to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “generally human with some aid from AI”. The results of worldwide surveys reported that people were more unpleasant with news topics including politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology portal

Artificial basic intelligence – Kind of AI with comprehensive abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that simulates discussion
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language model
Large language design – Type of device knowing model
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is produced algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of info retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, services, and federal governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, human beings win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the impact of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted procedure planning: the modern study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a conventional spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise include an architectural part explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and distinguish in between control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are not being watched multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some kind since ’15. ai‘ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates plausible pictures of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early explores GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that integrates six types of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI design it states can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI model – and a smart brand-new way to engage with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4″. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and risks of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “top quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers laid out in a paper the ethical obstacles that they encountered around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers debate over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design build times with new AI-driven part development method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway reveals new model”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is rudimentary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software … the brand-new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in some of the business’s most popular service apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most essential features for creative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself machine or customize the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced in your area, so you do not need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in the house, you will require a computer system build with a powerful GPU that can manage the large quantity of information and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with stringent U.S. export requirements that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to recognise phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be difficult. That’s a big problem for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for security, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first policy on synthetic intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect harder AI rules as draft relocations to last”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to apply only to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Beginning”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people think about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market reportedly annihilated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that clearly demands AI regulations to safeguard writers and the works they create. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has become an important sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically known as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘expert system positions an existential threat to imaginative professions, and all stars and entertainers should have agreement language that protects them from having their identity and talent exploited without permission and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the globe are stressed over AI being a hazard to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can reasoning conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech might start a global face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to enhance anti-U.S. impact campaigns, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the obstacles of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, state experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to produce star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get prepared for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ forecasts the biggest danger is that deepfakes will eventually become boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI takes off?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for environment modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental expenses are soaring – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design all of a sudden tries to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The latest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was workable and frequently recognizable. Large language models produce text that masquerades as genuine language with objective behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output appear all over,” she composed. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “delve,” in a way that people do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the prevalence of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively generated data”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered mistakes in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI post about ladies’s usage of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, everything – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news sites is releasing AI-written articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured using synthetic intelligence to develop fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI function after unreliable news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are surprised to discover their name and work have actually been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently getting into Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might lead to ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the business’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.